0
EN
1
المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech

Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment

قم بتسجيل الدخول اولاً لكي يتسنى لك الاعجاب والتعليق.

Early language Conclusions

المؤلف:  Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva

المصدر:  The Genesis of Grammar

الجزء والصفحة:  P354-C7

2026-03-30

321

+

-

20

Early language Conclusions

We observed the use of old means for novel purposes, and we showed how people constantly create novel usage patterns and functional categories by using existing linguistic material, extending it to new contexts and endowing it with new grammatical functions. We showed how this general strategy can be held responsible for human language developing into an increasingly more refined tool of communication and conceptualization. It is hoped that our discussion has demonstrated that there is nothing mysterious about complex structural phenomena such as syntactic recursion or displacement, which fall out naturally from a long sequence of applications of that very strategy.

 

A number of the hypotheses discussed here have been proposed in some form by other authors (especially Givo ´n 2002a, 2005; see also Jackendoff 2002; Tallerman 2007); what distinguishes our presentation from those works is that it is based strictly on the application of grammaticalization theory. This restriction has the advantage that our hypotheses can be falsified with reference to this theory; at the same time it also had enormous disadvantages. Language evolution has become a paradigm Weld of interdisciplinary research, where new findings made in areas such as evolutionary biology, psychology, psycholinguistics, neurology, genetics, palaeo-anthropology, the computer sciences, etc. have been or can be combined in order to reconstruct what a few decades ago still seemed to be beyond the scope of empirical research. In an attempt to be consistent in our methodology, we had to ignore all this work except for occasional cross-references.

 

For example, recent studies in computer simulation show independently that complex syntactic rules can emerge out of quite simple systems, such as neural nets, which have a small number of initial assumptions and learn from imperfect inputs, with numerous words acquired by observational learning (e.g. Batali 1998; Kirby 2000; Steels et al. 2002; Tonkes and Wiles 2002; Davidson 2003). Some of these simulations exhibit striking similarities to our grammaticalization scenario, and it would be tempting to relate the two to one another. However, as long as it remains unclear how exactly these similarities are to be defined, we refrain from pursuing this issue—hoping that future research will be able to draw on a more comprehensive basis of analysis.

 

In the preceding section we tried to find answers to questions that we consider to be relevant for understanding language genesis and evolution. But there were many other questions in addition that have been raised by students of language evolution. Suffice it, in concluding, to mention one question that was ignored here, namely to what extent language is, or is part of, an innate human faculty, and whether language genesis should not be accounted for with reference to such a faculty. This is in fact a much-discussed issue, but it is also an unresolved one. For our purposes it was of secondary import since our account of the genesis of grammar did not require any assumptions on innateness. Accordingly, irrespective of whether future research will establish that language evolution is, at least to some extent, determined by innate mechanisms, this would not seem to affect the findings presented here in any dramatic way.

لا توجد تعليقات بعد

ما رأيك بالمقال : كن أول من يعلق على هذا المحتوى

اخر الاخبار

اشترك بقناتنا على التلجرام ليصلك كل ما هو جديد