0
EN
1
المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech

Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment

قم بتسجيل الدخول اولاً لكي يتسنى لك الاعجاب والتعليق.

Constituency: heads and dependents

المؤلف:  Vyvyan Evans and Melanie Green

المصدر:  Cognitive Linguistics an Introduction

الجزء والصفحة:  C22-P763

2026-03-29

275

+

-

20

Constituency: heads and dependents

As we saw in Chapter 17, heads are described as profile determinants in Cognitive Grammar and the head-dependent relation is characterised in terms of conceptual autonomy and dependence. This view is consonant with the formal view in a number of ways. In particular, both models hold that the head or profile determinant lends its features to the phrase that contains it. The difference, of course, is that in Cognitive Grammar the features of the head relate to its schematic meaning (e.g. PROCESS or THING), while in formal approaches the features of the head relate to its grammatical category (e.g. V or N), which, as we have seen, is defined in structural rather than semantic terms. A second similarity between Cognitive Grammar and the formal approach relates to the metaphor of ‘dependency’ relations. In both models, the relationships between the component parts of a phrase are modelled in terms of dependence. Again, the difference lies in the fact that the Cognitive Grammar view of dependence relates to conceptual dependence, whereas the formal view relates to categorial selection. Of course, formal models also posit semantic selection in order to ensure, for example, that a verb like love selects an animate subject, but this process often operates independently of the grammatical component. This means that in the formal model of syntax, a head is entirely ‘autonomous’ within its phrase, in the sense that it selects all its dependents, some obligatorily (e.g. complement) and others optionally (e.g. modifiers). The Cognitive Grammar view is rather different: a head can be conceptually dependent on its ‘dependents’ if they elaborate some aspect of its structure. As we saw in Chapter 17, the head-complement construction illustrates this prototypical dependence relation. A further important difference follows from points that we have already discussed: in the cognitive model, constituency emerges from the properties of constructions, which are primitive. In the formal model, constructions emerge from ‘words and rules’, which are primitive.

لا توجد تعليقات بعد

ما رأيك بالمقال : كن أول من يعلق على هذا المحتوى

الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields

اخر الاخبار

اشترك بقناتنا على التلجرام ليصلك كل ما هو جديد

EN