المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6608 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
الحيض
2025-04-15
التيمم واحكامه
2025-04-15
Some analytical possibilities- Assimilating these to other effects of modifier position
2025-04-15
دودة قرون اللوبيا
2025-04-15
Some analytical possibilities- Blaming focus
2025-04-15
أهلية الوحدات الاتحادية في إبرام الاتفاقيات الدولية في قانون إدارة الدولة العراقية للمرحلة الانتقالية لعام 2004
2025-04-15


isochrony (n.)  
  
957   04:57 مساءً   date: 2023-09-27
Author : David Crystal
Book or Source : A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics
Page and Part : 255-9


Read More
Date: 2023-07-08 890
Date: 19-5-2022 2229
Date: 10-6-2022 1023

isochrony (n.)

A term used in PHONETICS and PHONOLOGY to refer to the rhythmic characteristic of some LANGUAGES; also sometimes called isochronism. In isochronous RHYTHM, the STRESSED SYLLABLES fall at approximately regular intervals throughout an UTTERANCE. This is ‘subjective’ isochrony, based on the perception of the listener – a more realistic interpretation of this notion than that of ‘objective’ isochrony, where the intervals would be measurably identical. One implication of this is that the theory predicts that unstressed syllables between stresses will be uttered in similar periods of time. If there are several unstressed syllables, accordingly, they will be articulated rapidly, to get them into the time span available. In such sentences as The ‘cconsequences of his ‘action are ‘several, the speed of ARTICULATION of the five syllables after ‘con- will be greater than the two following ‘ac-. Isochrony is said to be a strong tendency in English, for example, which is accordingly referred to as a STRESS-TIMED (as opposed to a ‘syllable-timed’) language. The UNITS of rhythm in such languages, i.e. the distances between stressed syllables, are called FEET by some phoneticians. The theory is not without its critics, who doubt the extent of the principle’s applicability, given the many variations in TEMPO heard in speech.