

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
DERIVATIONALTHEORYOF COMPLEXITY
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P89
2025-08-12
533
DERIVATIONALTHEORYOF COMPLEXITY
Early Chomskyan theory was based upon a set of transformational rules which derived surface structure sentences from their underlying deep structure forms. Thus the following sentences:
The old woman was warned by Joe.
The old woman wasn’t warned by Joe.
were both regarded as derived from Joe warned the old woman.
Early psycholinguistic research adopted an assumption (the correspondence hypothesis) that Chomsky’s transformational grammar was psychologically real and represented the exact processes employed by a language user. The user was thought to assemble a sentence in deep structure, then take it through a series of transformations. Hence the derivational theory of complexity (DTC), which hypothesised that the more transformations there were, the more difficult it would be for a listener or reader to process a sentence.
Initial research demonstrated that subjects were faster to match a jumbled sentence to its negative form (one transformation) than to its negative passive form (two transformations). However, the experi ment suffered from flaws of design– not least, the greater length of the more complex sentences; and later trials turned up sentences where processing time and number of supposed transformations did not correlate. It also emerged that passive transformations only delayed the matching task in the case of reversible passives such as The boy was chased by the girl and not in the case of irreversible ones such as The flowers were watered by the girl. This suggested that semantic as well as syntactic factors were involved in the matching task. Finally, the DTC theory was based on the assumption that readers wait until the end of a sentence before decoding it, which we now know is not the case.
See also: Syntactic parsing
Further reading: Aitchison (1998)
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)