

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
English /r/ Introduction
المؤلف:
APRIL McMAHON
المصدر:
LEXICAL PHONOLOGY AND THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH
الجزء والصفحة:
P230-C6
2024-12-26
1087
English /r/
Introduction
In The rôle of history, I quoted Labov (1978) in defence of my intention to reintegrate synchronic and diachronic evidence. Labov's (1978: 281) view is that, provided we adopt the uniformitarian principle, and therefore accept that `the forces which operated to produce the historical record are the same as those which can be seen operating today', we can use the linguistic present to explain the linguistic past. However, if we are serious about the reintegration of synchrony and diachrony, the connection should work both ways: that is, the linguistic past should ideally also help us understand and model the present.
The first part of the equation has already been proved: in Synchrony, diachrony and Lexical Phonology: the Scottish Vowel Length Rule, I showed that a possible life-cycle for sound changes and phonological rules can be formulated in Lexical Phonology. The default case was represented by æ-Tensing; and a variant pathway, involving two cycles of alteration of the underlying representations, was required for processes like the Scottish Vowel Length Rule, which involve historical rule inversion. A model designed primarily for synchronic phonological description therefore provides insights into change. I hope to show that we can indeed also use the past to explain the phonological present, with special reference to English /r/, which is of particular relevance because it has been discussed in a variety of phonological frameworks (see Broadbent 1991, McCarthy 1991, 1993, Scobbie 1992, Donegan 1993, Harris 1994, Giegerich in press); is characterized by interesting interactions between /r/ itself and preceding vowels; and arguably again involves rule inversion. We shall see that the ostensibly arbitrary synchronic process of [r]-Insertion in varieties with both linking and intrusive [r] is in fact historically principled, and that the synchronic situation has been produced by a series of historical steps, each conditioning the next. Moreover, each of these steps seems still to be preserved in some variety of Present-Day English. This further notion of the interaction of historical change and synchronic variation is familiar from creolistics: Bickerton, for instance, in describing the creole continuum in Guyana, claims that `a synchronic cut across the Guyanese community is indistinguishable from a diachronic cut across a century and a half of linguistic development' (quoted by Romaine 1988: 165). We shall see that this also holds, mutatis mutandis, for the English speech community in its widest sense.
However, it is not enough to explain synchronic patterns with reference to the changes which have created them: we must also account for the contributory changes themselves. To do so, I suggest we require further reference to phonetic parameters, and indeed a wholesale revision of the feature system: to this end, I shall tentatively propose the incorporation of the gestural system of representation used in Articulatory Phonology (Browman and Goldstein 1986, 1989, 1991, 1992; McMahon, Foulkes and Tollfree 1994, McMahon and Foulkes 1995, McMahon1996) into Lexical Phonology.
But this reliance on historical and phonetic evidence does not mean the analysis arrived at is phonology-free: on the contrary, a highly con strained phonological model will again force us to draw certain conclusions, not only about the current status of /r/, but also about its history. Thus, some arguments below will be historical, but others will be theory-internal, depending on particular properties of the model assumed here. The emphasis on formal models distances this approach a little from Labov (1978): while he defines the linguistic present largely in terms of social influences on speakers, and the quantitative analysis of inter- and intra-personal variation, I believe that part of a synchronic phonological analysis must also involve idealization from these data and consequent model building and evaluation. Where such models cast light on the interaction between synchronic phonology, dialect variation and sound change, this may in itself be evidence for that view.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)