Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Norfuk speech
المؤلف:
John Ingram and Peter Mühlhäusler
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
787-43
2024-05-04
1035
Norfuk speech
Reliable observational evidence on Norfuk speech and its changing characteristics are scarce. By far and away the best source of evidence – a window on Norfuk vernacular – at a time when the language was more actively used in the community, is provided by a set of 17 tape-recorded dialogues obtained by Elwyn Flint on a field trip to Norfolk Island in 1957. Elwyn Flint was a linguist at the University of Queensland from the 1950s up to the early 1970s. Flint had an abiding interest in peripheral varieties of English and language contact situations. He was a diligent collector of speech recordings from diverse communities throughout rural Queensland. Around the time when Flint was conducting his field work, Norfolk Island was coming under the influence of a second wave of massive external influence, primarily from Australian and New Zealand English. Subsequent work by Harrison and Laycock in the 1970s indicates that the stable diglossia that pertained up until Flint’s investigations no longer exists. Flint himself noted its loss, which is apparent from even cursory examination of the 17 recorded dialogues.
The following sketch represents an attempt to isolate some salient phonetic and phonological characteristics of Norfuk vernacular as it was in 1957, and to document some of the changes which have taken place up to the present day. The analysis is based on a finite corpus of data (the 17 dialogues: approximately 40 minutes of continuous recorded speech), supplemented by keyword lists of seven present-day speakers of Norfuk vernacular. From this data base, it is possible to: a) convey in some detail the flavor of Norfuk phonetics, b) to lay a basis for further investigation into the evolution of Pitcairn-Norfuk Creole(s), c) to provide something of a yardstick for evaluating the current state of sociolinguistic variation on Norfolk Island today and d) to provide guidelines for those concerned with language revival as to the properties of ‘authentic’ Norfuk vernacular as it was spoken some two generations previous to the present time. Clearly, it is not possible on this data base to reconstruct a comprehensive picture of the phonology of Norfuk. An attempt to do so for present-day Norfuk would probably be misconceived. Norfuk today may constitute a collection of individual speech registers that are parasitic upon the variety of standard Norfolk English which is habitually used in the daily discourse of Norfolk Islanders, outside of the circumscribed contexts in which they use the Norfuk register. Norfuk, as described here, represents a prominent feature in the topography of spoken language variation in Norfolk Island, but its linguistic significance needs to be assessed within a broader sociolinguistic context, the outlines of which are described elsewhere and are the subject of on-going research.
Two sets of speech recordings form the basis of the present analysis: (i) a selection from the Flint dialogues recorded in 1957 and (ii) an elicitation of a set of citation forms based on a key word list for comparison of English dialects (Wells 1982; Foulkes and Dougherty 1999) provided by seven regular speakers of Norfuk recorded in November 2002.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
