Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Simple
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Passive and Active
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Assessment
TOP-DOWN PROCESSING
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P307
2025-10-20
44
TOP-DOWN PROCESSING
The influence of higher-level (conceptual) knowledge upon lower level (perceptual) processing. The terms ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ are derived from computer science, where they refer respectively to information that is knowledge-driven and information that is data driven.
‘Top-down’ is sometimes loosely used as a synonym of ‘contextual’. However, strictly speaking, it refers not to a single level of processing buttoadirection of processing. Suppose the knowledge that a given word exists can be shown to affect the way we hear the sounds in that word. This can be described as a top-down effect, because knowledge at word level is influencing processing at a lower (phoneme) level. Similarly, the way in which speech or writing is planned can be described as a ‘top-down’ process since it begins with large, conceptual units (propositions) and ends with small, perceptual ones (words in the speaker’s mouth or on the writer’s page).
For this reason, the term ‘higher-level processing’ is often preferred when describing the use of contextual information, as against lower level decoding operations. Or a distinction is made between conceptual and perceptual processes.
The term ‘top-down’ is also sometimes used to refer to theories of reading or listening which hold that contextual information plays a more important part than perceptual. Again, this is misleading as it implies that a choice has to be made. Even ‘top-down’ accounts have to include at least some perceptual evidence. The issue is to establish how the two information sources interact and which one predomi nates in case of conflict.
There are conflicting views. Some commentators claim that top down information is only used for checking bottom-up. Some argue for bottom-up priority, with contextual evidence only invoked once sufficient bottom-up evidence has become available. Their case is based partly on the fact that bottom-up processing is more automatised than top-down, and therefore faster; and partly on the argument that too many sources of information impede rapid decision making. Other commentators favour a fully interactive model of listening or reading, contending that both sources of evidence are available throughout. They argue that it is more efficient to have all the information available at one time.
It is important to make a distinction between two different purposes for invoking contextual knowledge in listening and reading:
To compensate for gaps in understanding. In the case of the weak reader, the gaps might reflect weak decoding skills. In the case of the second language learner, they might be the result of a limited vocabulary or grammar or the inability to recognise known words in connected speech.
To enrich the meaning interpretation of what has been read or heard by bringing in world knowledge, knowledge of the discourse so far etc.
The second purpose characterises the more skilled listener/reader and the more advanced language learner. They have achieved a degree of automaticity in the way they decode language, which frees working memory resources and makes them available for considering the wider contextual implications of what is being read or heard.
See also: Context effects, Listening: higher-level processes, Reading: bottom-up vs top-down, Reading: higher-level processes, Speech perception: autonomous vs interactive
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
