0
settings
الوضع الليلي
moon
انماط الصفحة الرئيسية arrow
EN
1
المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech

Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics

Applied Linguistics

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment

قم بتسجيل الدخول اولاً لكي يتسنى لك الاعجاب والتعليق.

Probability Versus Demonstration

المؤلف:  SPIKE GILDEA

المصدر:  RECONSTRUCTING GRAMMAR

الجزء والصفحة:  C5-P162

2026-08-23

40

+

-

20

Probability Versus Demonstration

When hypotheses such as those mentioned in the previous section are advanced, what is sought is ‘proof’, and indeed phrases like ‘to demonstrate’ the relationship of A to B, a terminology which is, of course, ultimately taken from geometry, are frequently used. What is sought is certainty of the kind attainable in mathematics and logic. I believe there is at least a dim realization that in all empirical sciences, as against logic and mathematics, in which truths flow infallibly and tautologically from definitions, all that we can get are results so close to certainty that for all practical purposes we can consider them certain, that is, a hypothesis which is overwhelmingly better than any other. In the search for infallibility, certain criteria have been advanced which some linguists think will bring them results which are tantamount to certainty. The two most popular are the existence of sound correspondences and the reconstruction of a proto language from which the languages hypothesized to be related can be derived. Both of these will be considered later. For the moment, it is to be noted that the two approaches involve somewhat different metaphors from different nonlinguistic fields. Sound correspondences are often called laws, or more exactly, the sound changes that give rise to the correspondences, are the so-called ‘sound laws’. Here the analogue is to the laws of nature, which like sound changes brook no exceptions. They thus vicariously share the certainty and prestige of such laws as the laws of gravitation, one which is of course empirically founded. The metaphor of reconstruction is more like that of logic. The reconstructed forms are like postulates, and the changes like laws of deduction. Thus, the forms to be explained are derived by a procedure which has some analogy to that of deductive logic and in this way participates in its prestige and certainty.

اخر الاخبار

اشترك بقناتنا على التلجرام ليصلك كل ما هو جديد