

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
SCHEMATHEORY
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P254
2025-10-07
341
SCHEMATHEORY
A schema (plural: schemas or schemata) is a complex knowledge structure which groups all that an individual knows about or associates with a particular concept. The term, much used in discussion of comprehension theory, was introduced by Bartlett (1932) and extended by many commentators since.
As an example, an adult in Western society has a schema for RESTAURANT which entails: waiters/waitresses– a meal (not a snack)– a meal eaten on the premises– a main course with optional first course and dessert– menus– a bill– a chef (unseen)– cutlery glasses– napkins etc. This begins as episodic knowledge based on individual experiences of restaurants, but turns into semantic knowledge as the individual’s experience of restaurants grows.
When a reader encounters the word RESTAURANT, they access this schematic knowledge. It enables them to build a richer context than a writer provides; indeed, the writer can assume that the schema is shared with the reader, and is thus spared the need to go into excessive detail. Schematic knowledge also enables the reader to anticipate events and ideas which might occur later in the text and to relate incidents in the text to what happens in normal life.
Schemas which supply background knowledge to the interpretation of a text are sometimes referred to as content schemas. The reader’s ability to draw upon one may depend upon having a clearly established context for the text in question. A well-known experimental passage described how to use a washing machine but the schema could not be accessed without the assistance of an explanatory title.
Studies of reading and listening sometimes refer to formal schemas, which reflect previous experience of a text type or genre. Thus, in reading a scientific paper, we expect it to contain an abstract, a review of the literature, a presentation and analysis of data etc. This type of schema also provides expectations about style and register.
As well as referring to long-term knowledge structures, the term ‘schema’ is sometimes used more specifically to refer to the meaning representation that a reader or listener builds up while processing a particular piece of discourse. We approach a text with certain expectations about what it will say, which we derive from the title or from the purpose of the text; these enable us to develop a text-specific schema even before we read. As we read, we revise and add to the initial schema.
Schemas vary from one language user to another, and can be modified ad hoc to deal with a current situation. There are said to be three ways in which they can be changed. Tuning involves small adjustments made temporarily in order to confront immediate needs. Accretion modifies a schema gradually but permanently as new information is acquired or as repeated examples of contrary evidence accumulate. Thus, a child might have to adjust its category of DUCK to exclude birds that it has come to recognise as belonging to the category SWAN. Restructuring occurs when a sudden insight or new piece of knowledge leads to a radical reorganisation of existing knowledge structures.
Associated with schema theory are two other types of stored knowledge. A frame (Minsky, 1977) is a schema with optional slots. The frame for SHIP provides us with the information ‘large– means of transport– floats on sea– manned by sailors’. We then use information from the text we are reading in order to fill empty slots relating to purpose (warship vs ferry vs merchant ship), power (diesel vs steam vs sail), colour, destination etc. If the information is not provided, we fill the slots with default values. In the absence of further information, our slots for SHIP would probably be filled out with passengers, a funnel and a dark colour rather than guns, sails or bright red.
A script (Schank and Abelson, 1977) is a sequence of activities associated with a stereotypical situation. A RESTAURANT script entails a particular ritual (W = waiter, C =customer): W greets C– C asks if there is a table– W shows C to the table– W presents menu W asks what C wants to drink– C orders first two courses of meal. Scripts provide a framework for many everyday events, and permit speakers and writers to adopt a kind of shorthand. If we read Helen ate in a restaurant, we can supply for ourselves the details of what happened without having to have them spelt out.
See also: Listening: higher-level processes, Reading: higher-level processes
Further reading: Greene (1986: Part 1)
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)