Feedback

Effective learning requires feedback. When teaching ELLs, it is particularly important to ensure that your feedback is comprehensible, useful, and relevant.

Oliver (2003) notes that the way in which teachers correct language usage affects students’ verbal modifications. When teacher feedback on errors is constructive, students use the feedback to rephrase. According to Schoen and Schoen (2003) and Short (1991), rather than immediately correcting students, teachers should simply restate what the students say using the correct grammar, pronunciation, or vocabulary. Students can refer to this model in the future when they want to say something similar. Modeling correct grammar is beneficial for the student, but overemphasizing grammar is not.

To be able to give feedback on language, you must have a firm foundation in how our language works. Wong Fillmore and Snow (2000) put forth a strong rationale for the need for classroom teachers to understand language function and structure: Because knowledge of English language usage has been emphasized less and less over time, they recommend more training for teachers in the areas of linguistics, sociolinguistics, and language use.

Thornbury (1999) and Brown (2000) contend that if language learners only get positive messages about their output, they will not make attempts to restructure their grammar. If they think that everything, they are saying is accurate, they will stop short of full language proficiency and their incorrect usage will become “fossilized.” As an example, Thornbury recommends some possible responses for teachers when responding to the error in the sentence “He has a long hair”:

• “He has long hair.” This is a correction in the strictest sense of the word. The teacher simply repairs the student’s utterance.

• “No article.” The teacher’s move is directed at pinpointing the kind of error the student has made in order to prompt self-correction.

• “I’m sorry, I didn’t understand.” This is known as a clarification request.

• “A long hair is just one single hair, like you find in your soup. For the hair on your head you wouldn’t use an article; you would say: He has long hair.” This is an example of reactive teaching, where instruction is in response to errors.

• “Oh, he has long hair, has he?” This technique (sometimes called reformulation) is an example of covert feedback, disguised as a conversational aside.

Error correction can take many forms; it varies from the simple to the complex. Talk with your school’s ESL teachers regarding the forms of error correction that work best for them. We will be reminding you to model by repairing (first example above) and reformulating (last example above) when an ELL makes an error.

اخر الاخبار

اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

المجمع العلمي للقرآن الكريم يصدر الكتاب الثاني من سلسلة يخشى

قسم الشعائر يكرّم أصحاب المواكب المشاركة في إحياء ذكرى شهادة السيدة الزهراء (عليها السلام)

جامعة العميد تستقبل طلبة المراحل الأولى المقبولين ضمن كلياتها للعام الدراسي الجديد

سماحة السيد الصافي يكرّم طلبة حفظ القرآن الكريم المتفوّقين ويؤكّد دور التدبّر في الهداية والتكامل

المزيد

الآخبار الصحية

طبيب يكشف تأثير برودة الشتاء على النوم

دون أن تعلم.. 10 عادات يومية تسرع شيخوخة جسمك

تقرير: النيكوتين خطر على القلب مهما كانت الطريقة

أيهما أفضل لصحتك.. زبدة الفول السوداني أم النوتيلا؟

المزيد

الآخبار التكنلوجية

السعودية تدشن أكبر نظام لتخزين الكهرباء بالبطاريات في العالم !

بأمر تنفيذي.. ترامب يؤكد هدف عودة الأميركيين إلى القمر في عام 2028

بعيدا عن البشر.. "قتال جوي في الفضاء" بين أميركا والصين

كشف مذهل في قاع "برمودا" !

المزيد

مواضيع ذات صلة

Parents with Learning Disabilities CONCLUSION

PROVISION OF SUPPORT

CARING FOR CHILDREN

EUGENICS AND ETHICAL ISSUES

PARENTING

DISCRIMINATION AND DIVERSITY

THE HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Parents with Learning Disabilities

Legislation and Learning Disabilities CONCLUSION

LEGAL SAFEGUARDS

MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005

THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998