

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
GRAPHEME-PHONEME CORRESPONDENCE (GPC) RULES
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P124
2025-08-26
628
GRAPHEME-PHONEME CORRESPONDENCE (GPC) RULES
Rules which specify the relationship between a written letter and the phoneme which it conventionally represents. In a dual route model of reading, a lexical route permits the reader to match known words on a ‘whole word’ basis; but a second (sub-lexical) route is also available which draws upon the reader’s knowledge of GPC rules. The two routes appear to operate in parallel and the ability to apply GPC rules rapidly has been shown to be a characteristic of a skilled reader. The particular advantage of the sub-lexical route is that it enables the reader to process unknown words. The latter might be words never encountered in visual form, new coinages or proper nouns.
GPC rules have a more limited value with an opaque alphabetic system like that of English than with a more transparent one like that of Spanish. Indeed, if the rules were applied on the strict basis of one letter-one sound, up to 50 per cent of English words would be characterised as ‘irregular’. In an opaque system, GPC rules are therefore often taken to extend to clusters of letters (including digraphs such as SH- or-EA-). Alternatively, they are regarded as operating in conjunction with analogy effects which permit parallels to be drawn between, for example, RIGHT, FIGHT and MIGHT.
A connectionist view suggests that we interpret written words by means of a set of distributed representations based upon three-letter clusters: so an interpretation of the sequence HEAT would be the outcome of activation produced by the phoneme values for-HE, HEA, EATand AT-. Simulations of this process, however, have been restricted to four-letter words.
See also: Dual route, Reading: decoding, Reading: development
Further reading: Goswami and Bryant (1990); Oakhill and Garnham (1988); Rayner and Pollatsek (1989)
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)