

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
BOTTOM-UP PROCESSING
المؤلف:
John Field
المصدر:
Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P40
2025-08-02
575
BOTTOM-UP PROCESSING
An approach to the processing of spoken or written language which depends upon actual evidence in the speech signal or on the page. Smaller units of analysis are built into progressively larger ones. There is a contrast with top-down processing, the use of conceptual knowledge to inform or to reshape what is observed perceptually. The terms ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ are derived from computer science, where they refer respectively to processes that are data-driven and processes that are knowledge-driven.
Underlying the metaphors ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ is the idea that listening and reading proceed through levels of processing, with bottom-up information from the signal assembled into units of ever increasing size. In listening, the lowest level (i.e. the smallest unit) is the phonetic feature. The listener’s task might be portrayed as combining groups of features into phonemes, phonemes into syllables, syllables into words, words into clauses and clauses into propositions. At the ‘top’ is the global meaning of the utterance, into which new information is integrated as it emerges.
The truth is more complex. First, it is not certain that bottom-up processing involves all the levels described. Some researchers have argued that we process speech into syllables without passing through a phonemic level; others that we construct words directly from phonetic features. Nor does bottom-up processing deal with one level at a time. There is evidence that in listening it takes place at a delay of only a quarter of a second behind the speaker– which implies that the tasks of analysing the phonetic signal, identifying words and assembling sentences must all be going on in parallel.
A quarter of a second is roughly the length of an English syllable so the listener often begins the processing of a word before the speaker has finished saying it. Part of bottom-up processing therefore involves the listener forming hypotheses as to the identity of the word being uttered, which are activated to different degrees according to how closely they match the signal. The candidates compete with each other until, when the evidence is complete, one of them outstrips the rest. An important issue is the extent to which top-down evidence (from world knowledge or from knowledge of the text so far) can contribute to the activation of these word candidates.
Non-psychological accounts sometimes refer to a conflict between ‘bottom-up models’ of reading and ‘top-down models’. This is misleading, as it implies that a choice has to be made. The issue is not to argue the case for one processing type over another, but to establish how the two interact and which one predominates in case of conflict.
The evidence is contradictory. Some commentators would say that top-down information is only used for checking bottom-up; some argue for bottom-up priority with contextual evidence only invoked once sufficient bottom-up evidence has become available. Those who favour a fully interactive model of listening or reading contend that both sources of evidence are available throughout. One argument for relying initially on bottom-up information is that bottom-up processing is more automatised than top-down, and therefore faster. Another is that multiple sources of information prevent rapid decision-making. Conversely, those who favour an interactive model argue that it is better to have all the information available at one time.
Some commentators prefer to describe the processing of the letters, sounds and words of a message as lower-level processing (the opposite being higher-level). It is also referred to as perceptual processing (as against conceptual processing).
See also: Interactive activation, Interactive compensatory hypothesis, Modularity2, Reading: decoding, Speech perception, Top-down processing
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)