Read More
Date: 30-12-2021
794
Date: 5-1-2022
1057
Date: 14-2-2017
1487
|
As stated previously, if a set A is given explicitly, it is immaterial in which order the elements of A are listed, e.g. the set {x,y} is the same as the set {y,x}. In many instances, however, one would like, and, indeed, needs, to have some order in the appearance of the elements.
As an example, consider a coordinate plane with an x-axis and a y-axis; then we can identify any point in the plane by its coordinates 〈x, y〉. If you wanted to find〈〉
the point 〈a,b〉, you would move on the x-axis a units to the right or to the left from the origin (depending on the sign of a), and then you would move b units up or down. If a and b are different, then 〈a,b〉and 〈a,b〉denote different points. So, in this example the order in which the elements appear is relevant. This leads to the following
Definition 1.1. Let A be a set;
1. A is called a singleton if A = {x} for some x, i.e. if A has exactly one element.
2. A is called an unordered pair, if A = {x,y} for some x,y, if A has exactly two elements.
3. A is called an ordered pair if A = {{x}, {x,y}} for some x,y.
We shall usually abbreviate the right hand expression by
〈 x,y〉 = {{x}, {x, y}}.
The decisive property of ordered pairs is that two ordered pairs are equal if the respective components are the same. The following Theorem assures us, that the ordered pair as we have defined it has this property:
Theorem 1.1. Let 〈a,b〉and (c,d) be ordered pairs. Thenha, bi = 〈 c,d〉 if and only if a = c and b = d.
Remark. The expression “if and only if” means that
1. If 〈a,b〉= 〈 c,d〉, then a = c and b = d.
2. If a = c and b = d, then 〈a,b〉= 〈c, d〉. (This is called "the converse" of 1.)
So, we have to prove two directions, namely 1. and 2. Usually, “if and only if” is abbreviated as simply “iff”.
Proof. “⇒”: Suppose 〈a,b〉= 〈c, d〉; then, by definition,
〈a,b〉= {{a}, {a,b}},
〈c, d〉= {{c}, {c,d}},
and since they are equal by our hypothesis, we have
{{a}, {a,b}} = {{c}, {c,d}}.
We consider two cases:
1. a = b: Then,
〈a,b〉= {{a}, {a,b}} = {{a}} = {{c}, {c, d}},
hence, {a} = {c} which implies a = c. Furthermore, {a} = {c,d} = {a,d} which implies d = a = b. Thus, for this case we have shown that a = c and b = d.
2. a ≠b: Then, {a} ≠{a,b}. By our hypothesis we must have {a} = {c}, since both sets have only one element; this implies a = c.
Furthermore, {a, b} = {c,d}, since {a,b} has two elements. We have just shown that a = c, thus, {a,b} = {c, b} = {c,d}. This implies b = d, and this is what we wanted to show.
“⇐”: For the converse, let a = c and b = d; then, {a} = {c}, and {a,b} = {c,d},
hence,
〈a,b〉= {{a}, {a,b}} = {{c}, {c,d}} = 〈c, d〉
which is what we wanted to show.
You need only remember the property of ordered pairs given in the preceding Theorem;
it is not necessary to remember the set theoretic definition.
Definition 1.2. The Cartesian (or cross-) product A × B of two sets is defined
as
A × B = {〈a,b〉: a ∈ A, b ∈ B}
So, the operation × pairs the elements of A with the elements of B in such a way that the elements of A appear as first components, and the elements of B appear as second components. It is also possible to define Cartesian products for more than two factors, but we shall not do this at this stage.
Example.1. 1. Let A = {1, 2, 3} and B = {a,b}; then
2. Let A = R and B = R; then A × B = R × R is the set of all points in the Cartesian coordinate plane.
3. Let then A × B is the set of all points in
the plane which lie inside a square of side length 2 with centre at the origin.
|
|
مخاطر خفية لمكون شائع في مشروبات الطاقة والمكملات الغذائية
|
|
|
|
|
"آبل" تشغّل نظامها الجديد للذكاء الاصطناعي على أجهزتها
|
|
|
|
|
تستخدم لأول مرة... مستشفى الإمام زين العابدين (ع) التابع للعتبة الحسينية يعتمد تقنيات حديثة في تثبيت الكسور المعقدة
|
|
|