Died: 17 March 1853 in Venice, Italy

Christian Doppler's family were stonemason's who had a successful business in Salzburg, Austria from 1674. The prospering business led to the building of a fine house in the Hannibal Platz [now named Makart Platz] in Salzburg, near to the river. Christian Doppler was born in this family house and, of course, the family tradition would have had him grow up to take over the stonemason's business. However his health was never very good and he was quite frail so he could not follow in the family tradition.

Doppler attended primary school in Salzburg and then attended secondary school in Linz. His parents were unsure of his academic potential and consulted the professor of mathematics at the Salzburg Lyceum who recommended that Doppler should study mathematics at the Vienna Polytechnic Institute. The Polytechnic Institute had only been founded in 1815, so it was still a new establishment when Doppler began his studies there in 1822. He excelled in his mathematical and other studies and graduated in 1825. After this he returned to Salzburg, attended philosophy lectures at the Salzburg Lyceum, then went to the University of Vienna where he studied higher mathematics, mechanics and astronomy.

At the end of his studies at the University of Vienna in 1829, Doppler was appointed as assistant to the professor of higher mathematics and mechanics at the University, Professor A Burg. He published four mathematics papers during his four years as Burg's assistant, his first being A contribution to the theory of parallels. This assistantship was only a temporary post and Doppler, rather older than most others, began to seek a permanent post at the age of 30. In [11] Seidlerova explains how applications worked at that time in Austria:-

From 1825 all vacant professorships at Austrian universities and polytechnics were filled by public competition. It actually meant admission examination, where the questions were determined ... The applicants at various schools of the monarchy had to answer them in written form, which could take up to twelve hours. Part of the examination was also a short probationary lecture on an arbitrary topic in front of the appointed commission. The sealed answers, together with an evaluation of the lecture, were then sent to the school where the competition had been announced.

The final decisions were taken by the commission in Vienna but the applicants were only selected on their teaching ability, any sign of higher levels of knowledge would be treated as telling against the candidate. Doppler submitted himself to a number of these competitions, both for school and university places. He applied to schools in Linz, Salzburg, Gorizia and Ljubljana and for the chair of higher mathematics at Vienna Polytechnic and on 23 March 1833 for the professorship of arithmetic, algebra, theoretical geometry and accountancy at the Technical Secondary School in Prague.

While this was going on Doppler had to earn his living and he spent 18 months as a bookkeeper at a cotton spinning factory. This was a period of sadness and great difficulty for Doppler and it is not surprising that he decided to give up the unequal struggle and emigrate to America. He began to sell his possessions and visited the American Consul in Munich to make the necessary arrangements. However, when he was close to making the final decision he received an offer of the post at the Technical Secondary School in Prague. It had taken a long time for the process of appointing to reach its conclusion and Doppler took up his post in March 1835, almost exactly two years after entering the competition.

Doppler was ambitious and teaching elementary mathematics at the Technical School was not greatly to his liking. He tried for a post of professor of higher mathematics at the Polytechnic in Prague but without success. However, during 1836-38 he was able to teach higher mathematics for four hours a week at the Polytechnic. This brought in extra money which he certainly needed since he married in 1836.

Doppler did get another chance of a post at the Polytechnic, however, and at the end of 1837 the professorship in practical geometry and elementary mathematics became vacant. Doppler assumed the duties of the post but things were not that straightforward. Despite the fact that he was carrying out the duties, a competition for the post was held on 3 October 1839. Doppler did not have to take part in the competition but was hurt by the fact that it was held at all. He was formally appointed to the post in March 1841.

Doppler did not have an easy time teaching at the Polytechnic. Seidlerova writes in [11]:-

The examinations were very stressful. The terms of both oral and written exams had to be reported in advance to the Land Committee which also nominated the examination commissioner. For example, in January and February 1843 Doppler had to examine 256 students in 17 days, both in writing and orally, in arithmetic and algebra. The examinations took a minimum of six hours daily. The same number of students sat for the examination in "theoretical geometry" in June and July of the same year in a twelve day examination. Additionally in July and August it was necessary to examine 145 students in geodesy in eight days. ... In July 1847 Doppler orally examined 526 students in mathematics and 289 in geodesy.

By 1844 Doppler's health, always less than good, failed under the strain. He had to give up teaching and requested sick leave. He had support from Bolzano who wrote [13]:-

It is hard to believe how fruitful a genius Austria has in this man. I have written to ... many people who can save Doppler for science and not let him die under the yoke. Unfortunately I fear the worst.

The situation was made worse by Doppler's students complaining that he was too harsh in his examining. Doppler was investigated and reprimanded while the students were allowed to retake their examinations. Doppler considered himself totally innocent and demanded that the reprimand be withdrawn. Eventually the reprimand was reluctantly withdrawn by the end of 1844 but Doppler was not well enough to return to his duties until 1846.

With such a difficult time in Prague, it is no surprise that Doppler wanted to move and he was offered the professorship of mathematics, physics and mechanics at the Academy of Mines and Forests in Banska Stiavnica. Stoll writes [13]:-

When Doppler left Prague for Banska Stiavnica, he did not suspect that his stay in this city would be so short. The stormy year 1848 shook all parts of the monarchy and revolution broke out in Prague, Vienna and Budapest. Due to political unrest the situation in Banska Stiavnica became complicated and Doppler was once again seeking refuge.

He was now a figure of some importance so a move was now able to be made with less difficulty. He was appointed to Vienna Polytechnic, then on 17 January 1850 he was appointed as the first director of the new Institute of Physics at Vienna University. Doppler had reached the high point of his career.

What qualities had carried Doppler through the struggles of his early experiences to this important position? It was not, it seems, his great mathematical abilities, for despite his career as a mathematician he was always short of the topmost level when it came to mathematical research. In fact his grasp of mathematics may have been even less good than this for he wrote an elementary text Arithmetic and algebra published in Prague in 1843. Seidlerova, describing this work in [11] writes:-

Doppler's explanations were conducted in a very unfortunate way and demonstrated that in the basic questions of mathematics he groped more than his eminent contemporaries.

However, despite this Doppler did have genius within him. It was a genius that Bolzano saw from the very first. Bolzano reviewed the first paper which Doppler submitted to the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences in 1837. After recommending Doppler's paper on applied analysis for publication, Bolzano commented about Doppler himself. Dated Prague 25 September 1839, the report reads [13]:-

Mr Doppler has already demonstrated his very promising abilities to the scientific community through his numerous published works in mathematics and physics. The expectations raised by his hitherto published works would multiply when one enters into personal acquaintance with him. You are not only struck by how many highly interesting and fruitful ideas, in many areas of knowledge, that so young a scientist is able to produce, but you also convince yourself with the greatest pleasure that this exceptional spiritual power combines with an amiable character, genuine unaffected determination and with that pure love of science and truth ...

So Bolzano, himself a great mathematical innovator, could see the genius in Doppler. Not everyone could see it however. Kulik, who was professor of mathematics at the Charles University of Prague while Doppler worked at the Polytechnic, [13]:-

... did not have much understanding of Doppler's originality or of his intuitive ways of thinking.

Bolzano moved to Prague in 1842 and became secretary to the mathematical section of the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences. He was then in closer contact with Doppler and Bolzano wrote in 1844 [13]:-

Professor Doppler over several weeks has excited me with his ideas, the one more brilliant than the other. I must think about them day and night.

However two years before Bolzano wrote this, Doppler had presented his most famous brilliant idea to the Royal Bohemian Society. On the 25 May 1842 Doppler presented the paper On the coloured light of the double stars and certain other stars of the heavens. The minutes of the meeting reported on Doppler's lecture [10]:-

Mr Doppler talked about a wonderful phenomenon of the coloured light of the double stars and some other stars in the heavens. He sought the explanation of this striking phenomenon in formulating a new general theory, which included in itself as an integral part the theory of Bradley.

The paper presented for the first time the Doppler principle which relates the frequency of a source to its velocity relative to an observer. Doppler derived the principle in a few lines treating both light and sound as longitudinal waves in the ether and matter, respectively. Doppler was incorrect regarding light being a longitudinal wave. In fact Fresnel had already published his theory that light was a transverse wave but, although Doppler had read Fresnel's work, he did not accept it. However the error does not really affect the result of Doppler's principle. Doppler also was wrong when he tried to illustrate his theory with an application to the colours of double stars. Although Doppler was correct in saying that his principle would change the colours of double stars, depending on which star was approaching or receding from the Earth, the effect is too small to be significant.

Doppler does, however, make a remarkable prediction in his paper:-

It is almost to be accepted with certainty that this will in the not too distant future offer astronomers a welcome means to determine the movements and distances of such stars which, because of their unmeasurable distances from us and the consequent smallness of the parallactic angles, until this moment hardly presented the hope of such measurements and determinations.

Although changes in colours were impossible to observe with the instruments of the time, the situation with sound was rather different. As early as 1845 experiments were conducted with musicians on railway trains playing instruments and other trained musicians writing down the apparent note as the train approached them and receded from them. In 1846 Doppler published a better version of his principle where he considered both the motion of the source and the motion of the observer.

Not everyone of course was immedately convinced by Doppler's theory. His most vigorous opponent was Petzval, by this time professor of mathematics at the University of Vienna. Their dispute was based on a misunderstanding, in some sense both were correct but they could not see that they were arguing about different things.

No other work by Doppler came anywhere close in matching the importance of his publications on the Doppler principle. He did publish on electricity and magnetism, the variation of magnetic declination with time as well as several publications on optics and astronomical topics. His mind would continually come up with new ideas and so he was led to invent many instruments, particularly optical instruments, and improve existing ones. Most of his ideas are quite revolutionary, he was certainly a very original thinker, but on the down side most would just not work in practice. However one can often see the germ of some important future discovery there, even though the idea as presented by Doppler is basically incorrect.

Doppler had some difficulty becoming a member of the Royal Bohemian Society despite very strong support from Bolzano and his good relations with the Society. In 1837, when he reviewed the first paper that Doppler submitted to the Society, Bolzano requested in his report that Doppler be elected to the Society. This was not acted on but, in the following year, Doppler was proposed again and not elected in a ballot.

On 28 June 1840 Doppler was eleced an associate member of the Royal Bohemian Society after a close ballot of 7 for and 5 against. It does appear that after his 1842 paper he gained more favour for he was elected as an ordinary member of the Society on 5 November 1843 with 9 votes in his favour and only one against. In 1847 he was elected deputy secretary of the Society and became one of the leaders of the Society who showed, according to Bolzano's words [10]:-

... pure love of science and truth which rises high above narrowminded party-spirit as well as conceited inflexibility.

Other honours which came Doppler's way in 1848 were election to ordinary membership of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Vienna and an honorary doctorate from the University of Prague.

1. A E Woodruff, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990). 
   http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2830901214.html
2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica. 
   http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9030954/Christian-Doppler

Books:

1. H Grossing, Christian Doppler (1803-1853) I (Vienna, 1992).
2. P Schuster, Christian Doppler (1803-1853) II (Vienna, 1992).

Articles:

1. Bibliography of Doppler's work, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 76-80.
2. Brief cronology of Doppler's life, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 73-75.
3. J B Hearnshaw, Doppler and Vogel - two notable anniversaries in stellar astronomy, Vistas in astronomy 35 (1992), 157-177.
4. O Pöss, Christian Doppler in Banska Stiavnica, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 55-62.
5. A Schrötter, Obituary of Doppler, Almanach der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 4 (1854), 112-120.
6. J Schwippel, Christian Doppler and the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 46-54.
7. I Seidlerova, Christian Doppler and Prague Polytechnic, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 30-45.
8. M Solc, The way of the Doppler Principle to astrophysics, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 63-72.
9. I Stoll, Christian Doppler - Man, work and message, in The Phenomenon of Doppler (Prague, 1992), 13-29.