المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6095 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر

النحل المرزوم
1-8-2020
مزايا وعيوب العينة العشوائية الطبقية
16-3-2022
وليد الكعبة
20-01-2015
Open Tubular Columns and Packed Columns
4-2-2020
مواصفات المؤمن في نظر علي بن أبي طالب (عليه السلام) / الحزم في الأمور
2023-08-29
الطفل والأخلاق السيئة
2023-02-12

Adjectives derived from adjectives  
  
577   10:21 صباحاً   date: 2024-02-01
Author : Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Book or Source : An Introduction To English Morphology
Page and Part : 52-5


Read More
Date: 2023-09-18 499
Date: 14-1-2022 962
Date: 2023-07-02 769

Adjectives derived from adjectives

In this category, prefixes predominate. The only suffix of note is -ish, meaning ‘somewhat X’, as in GREENISH, SMALLISH, REMOTISH ‘rather remote’. By contrast, the prefix un- meaning ‘not’ is extremely widespread: for example, UNHAPPY, UNSURE, UNRELIABLE, UNDISCOVERED. Because it is so common, most dictionaries do not attempt to list all un- adjectives. This does not mean, however, that un- can be prefixed to all adjectives quite freely; we do not find, for example, ‘UNGOOD’ with the meaning ‘bad’ (though George Orwell included that word in the Newspeak vocabulary devised for Nineteen Eighty-Four).

 

Another negative prefix is in-, with allomorphs indicated by the variant spellings il-, ir- and im-, as in INTANGIBLE, ILLEGAL, IRRESPONSIBLE and IMPOSSIBLE. It is more restricted than un-, largely for historical reasons. For the present, it is worth noting the existence of pairs of more or less synonymous adjectives, one of which is negated with un- and the other with in- or one of its allomorphs:

(22)    eatable/uneatable                    edible/inedible

            readable/unreadable              legible/illegible

            lawful/unlawful                        legal/illegal

            touchable/untouchable          tangible/intangible

 

Such examples confirm that the use of in- is lexically restricted. As the negative counterpart of EDIBLE, UNEDIBLE sounds possible, especially if the speaker has limited education and has not encountered, or has momentarily forgotten, the form INEDIBLE. However, ‘INEATABLE’ as the counterpart of EATABLE is not a form that any English speaker would spontaneously use.