المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6140 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

الحياة الاقتصادية بؤس المسلمين وترف الامويين
2-4-2016
المذنبات
5-3-2017
محمد بن الحسين بن أبي الخطاب
30-8-2016
الطريقة الانطباعية - تقنيات تقييم التأخيرات
2023-04-18
مسعر أدياباتي adiabatic calorimeter
13-10-2017
الينابيع
4-1-2016

Adjectives derived from adjectives  
  
636   10:21 صباحاً   date: 2024-02-01
Author : Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Book or Source : An Introduction To English Morphology
Page and Part : 52-5


Read More
Date: 2023-08-16 754
Date: 15-1-2022 808
Date: 2023-12-18 850

Adjectives derived from adjectives

In this category, prefixes predominate. The only suffix of note is -ish, meaning ‘somewhat X’, as in GREENISH, SMALLISH, REMOTISH ‘rather remote’. By contrast, the prefix un- meaning ‘not’ is extremely widespread: for example, UNHAPPY, UNSURE, UNRELIABLE, UNDISCOVERED. Because it is so common, most dictionaries do not attempt to list all un- adjectives. This does not mean, however, that un- can be prefixed to all adjectives quite freely; we do not find, for example, ‘UNGOOD’ with the meaning ‘bad’ (though George Orwell included that word in the Newspeak vocabulary devised for Nineteen Eighty-Four).

 

Another negative prefix is in-, with allomorphs indicated by the variant spellings il-, ir- and im-, as in INTANGIBLE, ILLEGAL, IRRESPONSIBLE and IMPOSSIBLE. It is more restricted than un-, largely for historical reasons. For the present, it is worth noting the existence of pairs of more or less synonymous adjectives, one of which is negated with un- and the other with in- or one of its allomorphs:

(22)    eatable/uneatable                    edible/inedible

            readable/unreadable              legible/illegible

            lawful/unlawful                        legal/illegal

            touchable/untouchable          tangible/intangible

 

Such examples confirm that the use of in- is lexically restricted. As the negative counterpart of EDIBLE, UNEDIBLE sounds possible, especially if the speaker has limited education and has not encountered, or has momentarily forgotten, the form INEDIBLE. However, ‘INEATABLE’ as the counterpart of EATABLE is not a form that any English speaker would spontaneously use.