Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Argument structure
المؤلف:
Andrew Radford
المصدر:
Minimalist Syntax
الجزء والصفحة:
248-7
21-1-2023
1633
Argument structure
The assumption that subjects originate internally within VP ties up in interesting ways with traditional ideas from predicate logic which we touched on briefly. As we saw there, traditional work in logic maintains that propositions (which can be thought of as representing the substantive semantic content of clauses) comprise a predicate and a set of arguments. Simplifying somewhat, we can say that a predicate is an expression denoting an activity or event, and an argument is an expression denoting a participant in the relevant activity or event. For example, in sentences such as those below, the italicized verbs are predicates and the bracketed expressions represent their arguments.
In other words, the arguments of a verb are typically its subject and complement(s). It has been widely assumed in work spanning more than half a century that complements of verbs are contained within a projection of the verb – e.g. the suspect in (18b) is the direct-object complement of arrested and is contained within the verb phrase headed by arrested (so that arrested the suspect is a VP). Under the VP-Internal Subject Hypothesis, we can go further than this and make the following (more general) claim:
Such an assumption allows us to maintain that there is a uniform mapping (i.e. relationship) between syntactic structure and semantic argument structure – more specifically, between the position in which arguments are initially merged in a syntactic structure and their semantic function.
To see what this means in practice, consider the derivation of (18b) The police have arrested the suspect. The verb arrested merges with its direct-object complement the suspect (a DP formed by merging the determiner the with the noun suspect) to form the V-bar arrested the suspect. The resulting V-bar is in turn merged with the subject DP the police (formed by merging the determiner the with the noun police) to form the VP shown in (20) below (simplified by not showing the internal structure of the two DPs):
In a structure such as (20), the complement the suspect is said to be the internal argument of the verb arrested (in the sense that it is the argument contained within the immediate V-bar projection of the verb, and hence is a sister of the verb), whereas the subject the police is the external argument of the verb arrested (in that it occupies a position external to the V-bar constituent which is the immediate projection of the verb arrested). The VP in (20) is then merged with the present tense auxiliary [T have], forming the T-bar have the police arrested the suspect. Since a finite T has an [EPP] feature requiring it to have a subject of its own, the DP the police moves from being the subject of arrested to becoming the subject of [T have], forming The police have the police arrested the suspect. Merging the resulting TP with a null declarative complementizer in turn derives the structure shown in simplified form in (21) below:
Under the analysis in (21), the argument structure of the verb arrest is directly reflected in the internal structure of the VP which it heads, since the suspect is the internal (direct-object) argument of arrested and the police was initially merged as its external (subject) argument – and indeed a null copy of the police is left behind in spec-VP, marking the spec-VP position as associated with the police.
الاكثر قراءة في Syntax
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
