Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Referential Pragmatics Conclusion
المؤلف:
Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh
المصدر:
Pragmatics and the English Language
الجزء والصفحة:
44-2
26-4-2022
833
Referential Pragmatics Conclusion
While it is clear that no referring expression is devoid of semantic meaning (he has the sense of something singular and usually male; the pro-form do of some kind of action etc.), definite expressions, deictic expressions and anaphoric expressions depend in large part for their full meaning on both the hearer working out the relevant referents, the speaker choosing referring expressions to nudge the target’s understanding in the relevant direction, and both the speaker and the hearer collaborating in these processes. This is why they are both a semantic and a pragmatic phenomenon. We should also remember that referring expression forms do not always refer (it, the second word of this paragraph, for example, is not referring). We need to work out when they do and when they do not. The converse is also the case: sometimes non-referring expressions refer. We will focus on the uses and understandings of referring expressions in interaction. We have pointed out that referring expressions are not simply empty slots filled with contextual information. Those referring expressions can, and often do, trigger the relevant contextual information with which they are filled. They can be used for a range of functions, including the expression of psychological prominence or a particular viewpoint. We discussed how speakers select particular referring expressions according to their assumptions about the degree to which the referent is in the target’s mind’s eye. In turn, hearers interpret those referring expressions in part by taking into consideration what is implied by the speaker’s particular selection. We also introduced common ground and its role in influencing the selection of referring expressions and retrieval of referents. Finally, we focused on the dynamic and emergent characteristics of referring in interaction, including the exploitation of referring expressions, for example by choosing less obvious referring expressions to signal a particular interpersonal meaning such as relative power.
As far as English is concerned we have shown how, especially in our reflection boxes, some features that are common to many Englishes, such as the definite article, do not appear in other languages, and even within English English may have been different in the past. We have not only touched on contrasts with other languages, but also variation amongst Englishes and within a particular English. We also considered variation within speech and in writing. Apart from the obvious conclusion that discussions of workings of referring expressions cannot be based on data sets consisting just of English referring expressions, we should note that the way in which those expressions vary is a particular source of interest in its own right, whether it is accounting for changes from demonstratives to definite articles in terms of grammaticalisation, differences amongst written genres, or the role that referring expressions undertake in cueing their own interpretive frames. In fact, to fully understand the phenomena constituted by referring expressions we need to understand that variation.
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
