

علم الكيمياء

تاريخ الكيمياء والعلماء المشاهير

التحاضير والتجارب الكيميائية

المخاطر والوقاية في الكيمياء

اخرى

مقالات متنوعة في علم الكيمياء

كيمياء عامة


الكيمياء التحليلية

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء التحليلية

التحليل النوعي والكمي

التحليل الآلي (الطيفي)

طرق الفصل والتنقية


الكيمياء الحياتية

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء الحياتية

الكاربوهيدرات

الاحماض الامينية والبروتينات

الانزيمات

الدهون

الاحماض النووية

الفيتامينات والمرافقات الانزيمية

الهرمونات


الكيمياء العضوية

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء العضوية

الهايدروكاربونات

المركبات الوسطية وميكانيكيات التفاعلات العضوية

التشخيص العضوي

تجارب وتفاعلات في الكيمياء العضوية


الكيمياء الفيزيائية

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء الفيزيائية

الكيمياء الحرارية

حركية التفاعلات الكيميائية

الكيمياء الكهربائية


الكيمياء اللاعضوية

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء اللاعضوية

الجدول الدوري وخواص العناصر

نظريات التآصر الكيميائي

كيمياء العناصر الانتقالية ومركباتها المعقدة


مواضيع اخرى في الكيمياء

كيمياء النانو

الكيمياء السريرية

الكيمياء الطبية والدوائية

كيمياء الاغذية والنواتج الطبيعية

الكيمياء الجنائية


الكيمياء الصناعية

البترو كيمياويات

الكيمياء الخضراء

كيمياء البيئة

كيمياء البوليمرات

مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء الصناعية

الكيمياء التناسقية

الكيمياء الاشعاعية والنووية
Protein Tertiary and Quaternary Structures: -Protein Motifs Are the Basis for Protein Structural Classification
المؤلف:
David L. Nelson، Michael M. Cox
المصدر:
Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry
الجزء والصفحة:
p141-144
2026-04-19
99
Protein Tertiary and Quaternary Structures: -Protein Motifs Are the Basis for Protein Structural Classification
As we have seen, the complexities of tertiary structure are decreased by considering substructures. Taking this idea further, re searchers have organized the complete contents of databases according to hierarchical levels of structure. The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) data base offers a good example of this very important trend in biochemistry. At the highest level of classification, the SCOP database (http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop) borrows a scheme already in common use, in which protein structures are divided into four classes: allα, allβ, α/β (in which the and segments are interspersed or alternate), and α+ β (in which the α and β regions are somewhat segregated) (Fig. 4–22). Within each class are tens to hundreds of different folding arrangements, built up from increasingly identifiable substructures. Some of the substructure arrangements are very common, others have been found in just one protein. Figure 4–22 dis plays a variety of motifs arrayed among the four classes of protein structure. Those illustrated are just a minute sample of the hundreds of known motifs. The number of folding patterns is not infinite, however. As the rate at which new protein structures are elucidated has in creased, the fraction of those structures containing a new motif has steadily declined. Fewer than 1,000 different folds or motifs may exist in all proteins. Figure 4–22 also shows how proteins can be organized based on the presence of the various motifs. The top two levels of organization, class and fold, are purely structural. Below the fold level, categorization is based on evolutionary relationships. Many examples of recurring domain or motif structures are available, and these reveal that protein tertiary structure is more reliably conserved than primary sequence. The comparison of protein structures can thus provide much information about evolution. Proteins with significant primary sequence similarity, and/or with demonstrably similar structure and function, are said to be in the same protein family. A strong evolutionary relationship is usually evident within a protein family. For example, the globin family has many different proteins with both structural and sequence similarity to myoglobin (as seen in the proteins used as examples in Box 4–4 and again in the next chapter). Two or more families with little primary sequence similarity sometimes make use of the same major structural
motif and have functional similarities; these families are grouped as superfamilies. An evolutionary relationship between the families in a superfamily is considered probable, even though time and functional distinctions—hence different adaptive pressures—may have erased many of the telltale sequence relationships. A protein family may be widespread in all three domains of cellular life, the Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya, suggesting a very ancient origin. Other families may be present in only a small group of organisms, indicating that the structure arose more recently. Tracing the natural history of structural motifs, using structural classifications in databases such as SCOP, provides a powerful complement to sequence analyses in tracing many evolutionary relationships. The SCOP database is curated manually, with the objective of placing proteins in the correct evolutionary framework based on conserved structural features. Two similar enterprises, the CATH (class, architecture, topology, and homologous superfamily) and FSSP ( fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins) databases, make use of more automated methods and can provide additional information. Structural motifs become especially important in defining protein families and superfamilies. Improved classification and comparison systems for proteins lead inevitably to the elucidation of new functional relationships. Given the central role of proteins in living systems, these structural comparisons can help illuminate every aspect of biochemistry, from the evolution of in dividual proteins to the evolutionary history of complete metabolic pathways.
الاكثر قراءة في مواضيع عامة في الكيمياء الحياتية
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)